vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Legacy Housing Corp (LEGH) and ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC (OSUR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.8M vs $25.5M, roughly 1.1× Legacy Housing Corp). Legacy Housing Corp runs the higher net margin — 32.2% vs -72.1%, a 104.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ORASURE TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-28.5% vs -30.6%). Legacy Housing Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.7M vs $-9.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Legacy Housing Corp's revenue compounded faster (-9.1% CAGR vs -29.7%).
Legacy Housing Corp is a prominent U.S.-based manufacturer of affordable manufactured homes, tiny homes, and accessory dwelling units. It mainly caters to low- and middle-income consumers across North America, providing customizable residential solutions, supporting construction materials, and after-sales services for individual and community development clients.
OraSure Technologies, Inc. is a Bethlehem, Pennsylvania–based company in the medical device industry. Their products include diagnostic testing kits. The company had recently developed OraQuick testing kit, the first over-the-counter home HIV test.
LEGH vs OSUR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.5M | $26.8M |
| Net Profit | $8.2M | $-19.3M |
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 40.4% | -75.1% |
| Net Margin | 32.2% | -72.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -30.6% | -28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.5% | -78.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.38 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.5M | $26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $29.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.7M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.2M | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.8M | $54.1M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.7M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.5M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.8M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $-615.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | $-3.6M |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.2% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | 42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 41.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.2% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.6% | 44.5% |
| Q4 25 | 40.4% | -75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | -59.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.8% | -57.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.7% | -59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.3% | -33.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.6% | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.3% | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | 32.2% | -72.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | -50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.3% | -63.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.3% | -53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.5% | -28.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.4% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.1% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.1% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.60 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.59 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.64 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.65 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.60 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.5M | $199.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.6M | $340.8M |
| Total Assets | $580.3M | $403.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | $216.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $247.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $267.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $570.0K | $278.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0K | $267.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $621.0K | $263.8M |
| Q4 25 | $528.6M | $340.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $521.6M | $362.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $512.8M | $380.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $503.7M | $396.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $479.3M | $425.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.2M | $425.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $450.4M | $426.3M |
| Q4 25 | $580.3M | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $557.9M | $423.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.0M | $445.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $544.6M | $457.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $534.2M | $479.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $521.4M | $464.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $514.9M | $466.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $510.0M | $467.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.0M | $-9.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.7M | $-9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 61.6% | -37.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.1% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.32× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $28.2M | $-53.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $109.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $15.7M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $-347.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | -37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.8% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | -38.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | -67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.2% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.2% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | 13.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.32× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEGH
| Commercial Sales | $8.6M | 34% |
| Retail Store Sales | $6.0M | 24% |
| Inventory Finance Sales | $5.0M | 20% |
| Direct Sales | $4.4M | 17% |
| Other | $1.5M | 6% |
OSUR
| Product And Services | $24.9M | 93% |
| Other | $1.9M | 7% |
