vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lucas GC Ltd (LGCL) and MYOMO, INC. (MYO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MYOMO, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.4M vs $7.5M, roughly 1.5× Lucas GC Ltd). Lucas GC Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs -33.6%, a 39.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
MYOMO, Inc. is a medical technology firm that develops and makes wearable myoelectric orthotic devices to help people with upper limb paralysis or weakness regain functional movement. Its core products serve stroke, spinal cord injury and neurological condition patients, with primary market focus across North America.
LGCL vs MYO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.5M | $11.4M |
| Net Profit | $414.1K | $-3.8M |
| Gross Margin | 33.7% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | -24.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | -33.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -1366.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.20 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.1K | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-260.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-966.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | 62.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 67.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | 70.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 61.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -24.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | -47.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | -14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -103.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -36.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | -48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -35.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -102.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $606.9K | $18.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $11.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.3M | $11.4M |
| Total Assets | $8.8M | $38.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $606.9K | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $978.1K | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $17.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8M | $16.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -21.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-18.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | -21.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -104.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -34.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -27.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -88.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LGCL
| Recruitment service | $4.4M | 60% |
| Others | $2.9M | 39% |
MYO
| Direct To Patient | $7.9M | 69% |
| Clinical And Medical Providers | $3.5M | 31% |
