vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lucas GC Ltd (LGCL) and SES AI Corp (SES). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lucas GC Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.5M vs $4.6M, roughly 1.6× SES AI Corp). Lucas GC Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs -373.5%, a 379.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
SES S.A. is a Luxembourgish communications satellite operator supplying video and data connectivity worldwide to broadcasters, content and internet service providers, mobile and fixed network operators, governments and institutions.
LGCL vs SES — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.5M | $4.6M |
| Net Profit | $414.1K | $-17.0M |
| Gross Margin | 33.7% | 11.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | -387.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | -373.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 50.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.20 | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-17.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.1K | $-22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | 73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -387.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -262.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | -652.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -401.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -373.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -293.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | -642.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -214.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $606.9K | $29.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.3M | $214.8M |
| Total Assets | $8.8M | $272.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $29.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $606.9K | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $978.1K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $214.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $228.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $249.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $269.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $272.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $288.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $290.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-10.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-11.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -243.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 15.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-61.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -243.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -206.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -329.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -410.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LGCL
| Recruitment service | $4.4M | 60% |
| Others | $2.9M | 39% |
SES
Segment breakdown not available.
