vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Life360, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($146.0M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.6× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, Life360, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.4% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Life360, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (36.6% CAGR vs 13.7%).
Life360, Inc. develops family-focused safety and connectivity platforms. Core offerings include real-time location sharing, emergency alerts, driving behavior analysis tools and identity theft protection. It serves consumer markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, with most revenue from tiered premium subscription plans.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
LIF vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $146.0M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $129.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | 75.1% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 88.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 26.4% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1425.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.53 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $146.0M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.5M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.4M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.5M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.9M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.9M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.2M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | $129.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.0M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.8M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | 75.1% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.0% | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.4% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.6% | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.0% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.4% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.0% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.7% | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.8% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.2% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 88.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.5% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.08 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.15 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $494.3M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $548.2M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $959.7M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $494.3M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $455.7M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $432.7M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.9M | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.2M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $159.0M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.8M | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $73.4M | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $548.2M | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $391.4M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $366.7M | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $376.3M | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.5M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $326.7M | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $239.8M | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $959.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $787.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $753.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $455.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $405.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $318.8M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.02× | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $36.8M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 25.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.28× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $86.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $36.8M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.3M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.7M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.75× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LIF
Segment breakdown not available.
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
