vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (CVGI) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($154.8M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.7× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, Ranpak Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.3% vs -5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs -10.8%).
WABCO Holdings, Inc. was a U.S.-based provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. In 2007, the Vehicle Control Systems was spun off as WABCO Holdings Inc., an American provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Their products are present in many commercial vehicles such as trucks, buses, trailers and off-highway vehicles but they ...
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
CVGI vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $154.8M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 9.7% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | -5.2% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $154.8M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $152.5M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.0M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.8M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.3M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $171.8M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $193.7M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $194.6M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.8M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.3M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.4% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.9% | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | -1.2% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.6% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.09 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $104.9M | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $133.4M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $391.7M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.79× | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.2M | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.4M | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.5M | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.8M | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.0M | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $155.7M | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $133.4M | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.5M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.6M | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.7M | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.6M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $179.3M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.6M | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $175.5M | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $391.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $429.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $419.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $424.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $503.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $509.2M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.79× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.79× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.83× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.72× | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.84× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.89× | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $34.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.2M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.6M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.1M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.4M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.79× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.80× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CVGI
| Global Seating | $70.7M | 46% |
| Global Electrical Systems | $49.7M | 32% |
| Trim Systems And Components | $34.4M | 22% |
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
