vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Life360, Inc. (LIF) and PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Life360, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($146.0M vs $75.5M, roughly 1.9× PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.). On growth, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.7% vs 26.4%). Life360, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.6M vs $14.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Life360, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (36.6% CAGR vs 31.3%).
Life360, Inc. develops family-focused safety and connectivity platforms. Core offerings include real-time location sharing, emergency alerts, driving behavior analysis tools and identity theft protection. It serves consumer markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, with most revenue from tiered premium subscription plans.
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
LIF vs PBYI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $146.0M | $75.5M |
| Net Profit | $129.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | 75.1% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 22.7% |
| Net Margin | 88.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 26.4% | 27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1425.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.53 | $0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $146.0M | $75.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.5M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.4M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.5M | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.9M | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.9M | $47.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.2M | $43.8M |
| Q4 25 | $129.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.0M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.8M | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | 75.1% | 69.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.0% | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.4% | 76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.6% | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.0% | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.4% | 63.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.0% | 77.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.7% | 75.5% |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.8% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.2% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 88.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.9% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.5% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.08 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.15 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $494.3M | $97.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $22.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $548.2M | $130.3M |
| Total Assets | $959.7M | $216.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $494.3M | $97.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $455.7M | $94.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $432.7M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.9M | $93.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.2M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $159.0M | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.8M | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $73.4M | $107.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | $548.2M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $391.4M | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $366.7M | $104.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $376.3M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.5M | $92.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $71.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $326.7M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $239.8M | $51.0M |
| Q4 25 | $959.7M | $216.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $787.5M | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $753.6M | $194.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $455.4M | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $441.6M | $213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.4M | $220.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $405.9M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $318.8M | $214.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.02× | 2.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $36.8M | $14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.6M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 25.1% | 19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.28× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $86.8M | $41.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $36.8M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.3M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.7M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | $36.6M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.6M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.7M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.2M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.1% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.6% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.70× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.90× | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.75× | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.83× | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
