vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Lennox International (LII) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× Lennox International). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs 13.6%, a 17.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs -11.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (32.6% CAGR vs 6.8%).

Lennox International Inc. is an American provider of climate control products for the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration markets. Based in Richardson, Texas, the company is 9.8% owned by John W. Norris, III, a descendant of DW Norris, who acquired the company in 1904. The company's largest production facilities are in Saltillo, Mexico, Marshalltown, Iowa, and Orangeburg, South Carolina.

Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.

LII vs TER — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TER
TER
1.1× larger
TER
$1.3B
$1.2B
LII
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TER
TER
+98.2% gap
TER
87.0%
-11.2%
LII
Higher net margin
TER
TER
17.5% more per $
TER
31.1%
13.6%
LII
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TER
TER
Annualised
TER
32.6%
6.8%
LII

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
LII
LII
TER
TER
Revenue
$1.2B
$1.3B
Net Profit
$162.1M
$398.9M
Gross Margin
34.7%
60.9%
Operating Margin
18.6%
36.9%
Net Margin
13.6%
31.1%
Revenue YoY
-11.2%
87.0%
Net Profit YoY
-18.0%
EPS (diluted)
$4.62
$2.53

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
$1.3B
Q4 25
$1.2B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$769.2M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$651.8M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$685.7M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$752.9M
Q3 24
$1.5B
$737.3M
Q2 24
$1.5B
$729.9M
Net Profit
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
$398.9M
Q4 25
$162.1M
$257.2M
Q3 25
$245.8M
$119.6M
Q2 25
$277.6M
$78.4M
Q1 25
$120.3M
$98.9M
Q4 24
$197.7M
$146.3M
Q3 24
$239.0M
$145.6M
Q2 24
$245.9M
$186.3M
Gross Margin
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
60.9%
Q4 25
34.7%
57.2%
Q3 25
32.8%
58.4%
Q2 25
34.8%
57.2%
Q1 25
30.6%
60.6%
Q4 24
33.9%
59.4%
Q3 24
32.6%
59.2%
Q2 24
33.6%
58.3%
Operating Margin
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
36.9%
Q4 25
18.6%
27.1%
Q3 25
21.7%
18.9%
Q2 25
23.6%
13.9%
Q1 25
14.5%
17.6%
Q4 24
18.2%
20.4%
Q3 24
20.2%
20.6%
Q2 24
22.1%
28.8%
Net Margin
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
31.1%
Q4 25
13.6%
23.7%
Q3 25
17.2%
15.5%
Q2 25
18.5%
12.0%
Q1 25
11.2%
14.4%
Q4 24
14.7%
19.4%
Q3 24
16.0%
19.8%
Q2 24
16.9%
25.5%
EPS (diluted)
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
$2.53
Q4 25
$4.62
$1.62
Q3 25
$6.98
$0.75
Q2 25
$7.82
$0.49
Q1 25
$3.37
$0.61
Q4 24
$5.52
$0.89
Q3 24
$6.68
$0.89
Q2 24
$6.87
$1.14

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LII
LII
TER
TER
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$34.7M
$241.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.1B
$0
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.2B
Total Assets
$4.1B
$4.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.98×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
$241.9M
Q4 25
$34.7M
$293.8M
Q3 25
$59.2M
$272.7M
Q2 25
$55.1M
$339.3M
Q1 25
$222.9M
$475.6M
Q4 24
$422.3M
$553.4M
Q3 24
$255.7M
$510.0M
Q2 24
$57.8M
$421.9M
Total Debt
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
$0
Q4 25
$1.1B
Q3 25
$838.2M
Q2 25
$835.7M
Q1 25
$834.2M
Q4 24
$833.1M
Q3 24
$827.6M
Q2 24
$1.1B
Stockholders' Equity
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.2B
$2.8B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$900.5M
$2.8B
Q1 25
$852.5M
$2.8B
Q4 24
$850.2M
$2.8B
Q3 24
$754.0M
$2.9B
Q2 24
$577.4M
$2.7B
Total Assets
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
$4.4B
Q4 25
$4.1B
$4.2B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$4.0B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$3.8B
Q1 25
$3.5B
$3.7B
Q4 24
$3.5B
$3.7B
Q3 24
$3.3B
$3.8B
Q2 24
$3.2B
$3.6B
Debt / Equity
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.98×
Q3 25
0.78×
Q2 25
0.93×
Q1 25
0.98×
Q4 24
0.98×
Q3 24
1.10×
Q2 24
1.95×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LII
LII
TER
TER
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$405.9M
$265.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$376.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
31.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.50×
0.66×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$638.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
$265.1M
Q4 25
$405.9M
$281.6M
Q3 25
$300.7M
$49.0M
Q2 25
$86.8M
$182.1M
Q1 25
$-35.8M
$161.6M
Q4 24
$332.4M
$282.6M
Q3 24
$452.1M
$166.3M
Q2 24
$184.0M
$216.1M
Free Cash Flow
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
$376.7M
$218.8M
Q3 25
$265.1M
$2.4M
Q2 25
$58.3M
$131.7M
Q1 25
$-61.3M
$97.6M
Q4 24
$272.2M
$225.2M
Q3 24
$410.9M
$114.4M
Q2 24
$151.3M
$171.2M
FCF Margin
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
31.5%
20.2%
Q3 25
18.6%
0.3%
Q2 25
3.9%
20.2%
Q1 25
-5.7%
14.2%
Q4 24
20.2%
29.9%
Q3 24
27.4%
15.5%
Q2 24
10.4%
23.5%
Capex Intensity
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.4%
5.8%
Q3 25
2.5%
6.1%
Q2 25
1.9%
7.7%
Q1 25
2.4%
9.3%
Q4 24
4.5%
7.6%
Q3 24
2.8%
7.0%
Q2 24
2.3%
6.1%
Cash Conversion
LII
LII
TER
TER
Q1 26
0.66×
Q4 25
2.50×
1.09×
Q3 25
1.22×
0.41×
Q2 25
0.31×
2.32×
Q1 25
-0.30×
1.63×
Q4 24
1.68×
1.93×
Q3 24
1.89×
1.14×
Q2 24
0.75×
1.16×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LII
LII

Residential Heating And Cooling$699.8M59%
Commercial Heating And Cooling$495.2M41%

TER
TER

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons