vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) and PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($123.5M vs $83.1M, roughly 1.5× PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp). El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs -38.1%, a 43.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 8.1%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs 3.1%).
El Pollo Loco, Inc., is a restaurant chain based in the United States, specializing in Mexican-style grilled chicken. Restaurant service consists of dine-in and take-out, with some locations offering drive-through options. The company is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, and operates about 500 company-owned and franchised restaurants in the Southwestern United States.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
LOCO vs PRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $123.5M | $83.1M |
| Net Profit | $6.5M | $-31.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | -38.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.9% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.22 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $123.5M | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.5M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $125.8M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.2M | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.3M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.4M | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | $53.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $-25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | -40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | -50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | -39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | -35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | -48.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.25 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.24 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.2M | $245.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $51.0M | $51.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $291.1M | $347.7M |
| Total Assets | $606.6M | $487.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | $286.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $302.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $333.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | $214.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.0M | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.0M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.0M | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.0M | $51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.0M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | $51.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $347.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $291.1M | $365.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $282.9M | $380.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.2M | $385.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.7M | $389.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.7M | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.2M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.6M | $251.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $487.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $606.6M | $508.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $602.7M | $511.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $596.8M | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.5M | $519.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0M | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $590.0M | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $593.8M | $374.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.27× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.30× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.35× | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $13.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.13× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.3M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.0M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | $-15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $-33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $-16.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | -15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | -27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | -49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | -31.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.22× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOCO
| Services | $102.4M | 83% |
| Franchise | $13.0M | 11% |
| Franchise Advertising Fee | $8.1M | 7% |
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |
