vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($123.5M vs $100.0M, roughly 1.2× Latham Group, Inc.). El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs -7.0%, a 12.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Latham Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.5% vs 8.1%). Latham Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.1M vs $5.1M). Over the past eight quarters, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -4.9%).
El Pollo Loco, Inc., is a restaurant chain based in the United States, specializing in Mexican-style grilled chicken. Restaurant service consists of dine-in and take-out, with some locations offering drive-through options. The company is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, and operates about 500 company-owned and franchised restaurants in the Southwestern United States.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
LOCO vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $123.5M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $6.5M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.9% | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.22 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $123.5M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.5M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $125.8M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.2M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.3M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.4M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | $160.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $110.6M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.25 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.24 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.19 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $51.0M | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $291.1M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $606.6M | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $51.0M | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.0M | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.0M | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.0M | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.0M | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | $282.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.0M | $282.8M |
| Q4 25 | $291.1M | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $282.9M | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.2M | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.7M | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.7M | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.2M | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.6M | $408.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.3M | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $606.6M | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $602.7M | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $596.8M | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.5M | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0M | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $590.0M | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $593.8M | $830.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $598.0M | $808.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.27× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.30× | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.35× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 0.72× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $13.9M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.1M | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.1% | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.1% | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.13× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.4M | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.3M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.0M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9M | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | $-39.9M |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.99× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.11× | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.22× | 3.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.89× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOCO
| Services | $102.4M | 83% |
| Franchise | $13.0M | 11% |
| Franchise Advertising Fee | $8.1M | 7% |
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
