vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Grand Canyon Education, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($308.1M vs $184.5M, roughly 1.7× DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC). Grand Canyon Education, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.1% vs 7.0%, a 21.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 5.3%). Grand Canyon Education, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($122.9M vs $92.8M). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 5.9%).
Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (GCE) is an American for-profit corporation that provides services to universities, specializing in program development, online education, and operational support. Formerly affiliated with Grand Canyon University (GCU), a Christian university in Arizona, GCE became a separate publicly traded company in 2008.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
LOPE vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $308.1M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $86.7M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 35.1% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | 28.1% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.3% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.13 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $308.1M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.1M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $247.5M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $289.3M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $292.6M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.3M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.5M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $274.7M | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.5M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.6M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.9M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.5M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.9M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.0M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 35.1% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.9% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.2% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.8% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 28.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.4% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $3.13 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.58 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.48 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.52 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.83 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.42 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.19 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.29 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $111.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $746.9M | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $992.3M | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $111.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $192.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $241.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $196.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $746.9M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $758.0M | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $778.0M | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $780.7M | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $783.9M | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $764.1M | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $759.2M | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $759.4M | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | $992.3M | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $992.9M | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $992.7M | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $130.5M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $122.9M | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 39.9% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.50× | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $238.6M | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $130.5M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-48.6M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.0M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.8M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-29.4M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.0M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $122.9M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-58.3M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.4M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.1M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-39.0M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.6M | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.0M | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | 39.9% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.3% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.6% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.3% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.7% | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.50× | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.99× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.98× | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.94× | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.66× | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.71× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.83× | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOPE
Segment breakdown not available.
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
