vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lovesac Co (LOVE) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lovesac Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($150.2M vs $142.9M, roughly 1.1× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). Lovesac Co runs the higher net margin — -7.0% vs -30.3%, a 23.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lovesac Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.2% vs -0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.6% CAGR vs -22.6%).
The Lovesac Company is an American furniture retailer, specializing in a patented modular furniture system called Sactionals. Sactionals consist of two combinable pieces, “Seats” and “Sides,” as well as custom-fit covers and associated accessories. Lovesac also sells Sacs, a bag seat filled with a proprietary foam mixture.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
LOVE vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $150.2M | $142.9M |
| Net Profit | $-10.6M | $-43.2M |
| Gross Margin | 56.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -7.0% | -30.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.2% | -0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -114.0% | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.72 | $-0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $150.2M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $160.5M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.4M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.5M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.9M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.6M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.6M | $143.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $250.5M | $144.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.6M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.7M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.8M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.9M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.0M | $-27.8M |
| Q4 25 | 56.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.0% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.1% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.3% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.7% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.8% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | -19.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.72 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.45 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.73 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.22 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.32 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.38 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.83 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.91 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.7M | $731.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $189.3M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $495.5M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.7M | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.7M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | $138.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.0M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $189.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $202.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $217.5M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $495.5M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.7M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $483.7M | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $532.3M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $499.7M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $481.1M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $477.2M | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.2M | $4.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.9M | $140.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-13.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.9M | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-41.4M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.0M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.0M | $66.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $23.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-50.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | -6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.82× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOVE
| Showrooms | $102.7M | 68% |
| Internet | $37.3M | 25% |
| Other | $10.2M | 7% |
PDM
| Atlanta GA | $45.7M | 32% |
| Dallas TX | $24.1M | 17% |
| Orlando FL | $19.3M | 13% |
| New York NY | $14.7M | 10% |
| Northern Virginia Washington D.C. | $12.9M | 9% |
| Minneapolis MN | $11.4M | 8% |
| Boston MA | $9.8M | 7% |
| Real Estate Other | $7.8M | 5% |
