vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lovesac Co (LOVE) and Service Properties Trust (SVC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Service Properties Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($296.5M vs $150.2M, roughly 2.0× Lovesac Co). Service Properties Trust runs the higher net margin — -0.3% vs -7.0%, a 6.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lovesac Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.2% vs -17.0%). Lovesac Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-10.2M vs $-95.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Service Properties Trust's revenue compounded faster (-6.1% CAGR vs -22.6%).
The Lovesac Company is an American furniture retailer, specializing in a patented modular furniture system called Sactionals. Sactionals consist of two combinable pieces, “Seats” and “Sides,” as well as custom-fit covers and associated accessories. Lovesac also sells Sacs, a bag seat filled with a proprietary foam mixture.
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
LOVE vs SVC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $150.2M | $296.5M |
| Net Profit | $-10.6M | $-782.0K |
| Gross Margin | 56.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | -3.9% |
| Net Margin | -7.0% | -0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.2% | -17.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -114.0% | 99.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.72 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $150.2M | $296.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $160.5M | $377.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.4M | $404.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.5M | $335.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.9M | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.6M | $390.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.6M | $412.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $250.5M | $336.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.6M | $-782.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.7M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.8M | $-38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | $-116.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.9M | $-76.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $-73.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.0M | $-78.4M |
| Q4 25 | 56.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 58.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.5% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.5% | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.8% | -9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | -33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.2% | -19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.3% | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.5% | -17.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | -21.4% |
| Q4 25 | -7.0% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.1% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | -9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | -34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.3% | -21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.7% | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.8% | -17.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | -23.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.72 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.45 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.73 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.22 | $-0.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.32 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.38 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.83 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.91 | $-0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.7M | $346.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $189.3M | $646.1M |
| Total Assets | $495.5M | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 8.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.7M | $346.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.2M | $417.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | $80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.7M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.4M | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.0M | $71.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $189.3M | $646.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.5M | $647.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $201.2M | $695.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.4M | $734.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.5M | $851.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $202.1M | $929.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $217.5M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $495.5M | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $493.7M | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $483.7M | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $532.3M | $7.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $499.7M | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $481.1M | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $477.2M | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.2M | $7.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.9M | $-18.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.2M | $-95.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.8% | -32.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | 25.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-13.6M | $-107.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.9M | $-18.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-41.4M | $-7.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.0M | $38.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $106.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.0M | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $-926.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-10.2M | $-95.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-50.0M | $-46.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | $-23.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.6M | $-88.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.0K | $24.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.3M | $-22.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.5M | $-77.2M |
| Q4 25 | -6.8% | -32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -36.1% | -11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | -6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.4% | -24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.8% | -5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | -23.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 22.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.82× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOVE
| Showrooms | $102.7M | 68% |
| Internet | $37.3M | 25% |
| Other | $10.2M | 7% |
SVC
Segment breakdown not available.