vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
La Rosa Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.2M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.4× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs -27.4%, a 64.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, La Rosa Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -1.5%).
V. La Rosa and Sons Macaroni Company was founded in 1914 by Vincenzo La Rosa, a Sicilian immigrant. The company eventually became one of the largest regional brands in the United States producing over 40 varieties of pasta.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
LRHC vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.2M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $-5.5M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 8.4% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | -24.7% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | -27.4% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -125.7% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-5.44 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $6.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-95.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-343.8K | — |
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 8.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | -24.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -6.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | -27.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 337.8% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -546.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.2% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.1% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -5.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-5.44 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.25 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.86 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.54 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.49 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.49 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-0.06 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.0M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $642.8K | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $21.7M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.41× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $350.3K | — |
| Q3 25 | $642.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $644.3K | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $645.9K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.6K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $649.2K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.8K | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $652.4K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-87.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $722.5K | — |
| Q3 25 | $21.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.7M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $5.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.19× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-591.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-803.1K | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-538.3K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
SPCB
Segment breakdown not available.
