vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES INC (NTWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.8M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.4× Laird Superfood, Inc.). NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 1.3% vs -13.2%, a 14.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NETSOL TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.1% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 10.3%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
NetSol Technologies Inc. is an American software company which makes automobile leasing software. It is based in Encino, California.
LSF vs NTWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $18.8M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $246.8K |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | 1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | 21.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | 121.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $15.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $246.8K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $70.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $-82.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $327.5K |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 48.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 56.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 49.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | 45.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 51.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 48.3% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | -5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | 8.5% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | -15.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | -7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $18.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $337.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $35.9M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $62.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $17.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $12.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $337.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $218.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $134.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $86.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $87.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $92.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $95.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $130.4K |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $35.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $37.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $35.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $34.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $34.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $35.3M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $62.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $62.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $62.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $58.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $62.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $64.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $63.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $-4.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-5.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -27.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -19.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-1.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $-4.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $441.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-363.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $-4.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-44.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-693.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -36.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -29.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -19.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
NTWK
| Core Revenue | $18.0M | 96% |
| Other | $816.8K | 4% |
