vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and OP Bancorp (OPBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OP Bancorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($24.3M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.8× Laird Superfood, Inc.). On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 13.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 11.4%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
OP Bancorp is the bank holding company for Open Bank, a community-oriented commercial bank headquartered in California, United States. It provides a full range of banking solutions including deposit accounts, commercial real estate loans, small business financing, and consumer lending products, primarily catering to small and medium-sized enterprises, local immigrant communities, and retail clients across Southern California.
LSF vs OPBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $24.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | 39.2% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $23.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $22.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | 39.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 35.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | 34.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | 37.1% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 25.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | 26.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $167.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $227.9M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $167.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $166.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $205.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $198.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $134.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $166.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $127.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $139.2M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $227.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $221.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $213.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $210.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $203.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $195.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $194.7M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $2.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $26.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $23.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 96.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $43.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $23.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 96.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 95.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -32.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 139.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 61.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.90× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
OPBK
Segment breakdown not available.
