vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and PARK AEROSPACE CORP (PKE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PARK AEROSPACE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.3M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.3× Laird Superfood, Inc.). PARK AEROSPACE CORP runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs -13.2%, a 30.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PARK AEROSPACE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.3% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 3.0%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
Park Electrochemical Corp, now called the Park Aerospace Corp, is a Melville, New York-based materials manufacturer for the telecommunications, Internet infrastructure, high-end computing, and aerospace industries. It produces high-technology digital and radio frequency(RF)/microwave printed circuit material products, composite materials. Its printed circuit materials are used for complex multilayer printed circuit boards and other electronic interconnection systems, such as multilayer back-p...
LSF vs PKE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $17.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $3.0M |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | 21.0% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | 17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | 20.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | 87.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $16.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $993.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $2.7M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 29.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 27.3% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | 15.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $63.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $106.6M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $118.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $65.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $68.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $70.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $74.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $77.2M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $106.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $105.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $105.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $107.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $107.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $110.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $111.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $112.9M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $118.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $120.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $122.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $124.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $125.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $129.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $132.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $5.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $4.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $3.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $969.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $-423.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $338.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-435.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
PKE
| North America | $16.8M | 97% |
| Other | $546.0K | 3% |
