vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc. (RMBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $13.1M, roughly 1.0× Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc.). Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.1% vs -13.2%, a 39.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.1% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 9.1%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
Richmond Mutual Bancorporation, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating primarily in Indiana. It offers a full range of personal and commercial banking solutions including deposit accounts, mortgage loans, small business lending, and wealth management services, serving local retail consumers and small-to-medium enterprise clients via its regional branch network.
LSF vs RMBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $13.1M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $3.4M |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | 26.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | 18.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | 37.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $2.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | 22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 17.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | 21.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $33.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $145.8M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $33.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $34.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $27.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $20.3M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $145.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $132.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $130.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $132.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $131.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $132.4M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $16.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 111.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.68× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $26.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 111.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 129.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.91× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
RMBI
Segment breakdown not available.
