vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Snail, Inc. (SNAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snail, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.1M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.9× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Snail, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.4% vs -13.2%, a 9.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Snail, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.4% CAGR vs 16.1%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
Suzhou Snail Digital Technology Co., Ltd., doing business as Snail, is a Chinese video game company and a Virtual Network Operator headquartered in Suzhou, China, which has branches Snail Games and Snail Mobile. Its division, Snail USA, markets Snail Games products in North America, South America, & Europe. Snail Games products include massively multiplayer online (MMOs), real-time strategy (RTS), and casual games. Its global registered user base has reached over 70 million accounts. The U.S....
LSF vs SNAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $25.1M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $-862.2K |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | -6.0% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | -4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | -177.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $14.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $-862.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $235.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-1.8M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | -71.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | -20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | -15.6% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | -56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | -12.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $8.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $14.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $-16.4M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $59.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $16.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $-16.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $64.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $66.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $75.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $78.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $-5.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $764.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $206.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $6.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -21.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
SNAL
| Pc | $14.7M | 59% |
| Platform Three | $5.2M | 21% |
| Platform Two | $3.3M | 13% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer Mobile Sale | $1.6M | 6% |
