vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SuperCom Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.2M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.1× Laird Superfood, Inc.). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs -13.2%, a 50.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -1.5%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
LSF vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
SPCB
Segment breakdown not available.
