vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.2× TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 11.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 3.5%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
LSF vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $51.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
TACT
Segment breakdown not available.
