vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Veritone, Inc. (VERI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Veritone, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.6M vs $13.3M, roughly 2.0× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Laird Superfood, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.2% vs -109.8%, a 96.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Veritone, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.1% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Veritone, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (39.0% CAGR vs 16.1%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
Veritone, Inc. is an American artificial intelligence technology company based in Irvine, California founded in 2014. It serves a variety of industries including media, professional sports teams, federal government agencies, energy utilities, and state and local police departments.
LSF vs VERI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $26.6M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $-29.2M |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | -68.2% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | -109.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | 21.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | -34.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $26.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $24.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $24.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $-29.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $-26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $-19.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $-21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $-22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-25.2M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 72.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | 71.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 72.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 70.8% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | -68.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | -82.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | -96.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | -93.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | -102.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | -84.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | -100.9% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | -109.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | -114.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | -88.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | 141.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -98.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | -92.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | -104.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.85 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.57 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.59 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $36.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $35.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $15.5M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $198.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $16.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $16.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $90.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $39.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $73.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $75.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $77.5M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $15.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $14.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $14.9M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $198.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $188.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $199.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $336.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $321.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $359.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $-15.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-17.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -64.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-46.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $-42.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $14.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-17.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-44.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -64.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -39.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -81.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -183.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 54.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
VERI
| Software Products And Services | $20.9M | 78% |
| Other | $2.3M | 9% |
| Public Sector | $2.0M | 7% |
| Representation Services | $1.5M | 6% |
