vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. (LVLU) and Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($66.1M vs $51.2M, roughly 1.3× Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.). Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -48.2% vs -106.3%, a 58.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.4% vs -11.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.4% CAGR vs -14.7%).
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. is a direct-to-consumer women's fashion retailer offering affordable, trendy apparel, footwear, and accessories. It primarily serves Gen Z and millennial consumers across North America, operating mainly via its e-commerce platform, with limited pop-up physical locations to boost customer engagement.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
LVLU vs PLYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $66.1M | $51.2M |
| Net Profit | $-31.9M | $-54.4M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -52.8% | -102.5% |
| Net Margin | -48.2% | -106.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.8% | -1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -340.9% | -248.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.46 | $-1.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.1M | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.5M | $51.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.3M | $50.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $83.1M | $50.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-54.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.9M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.9M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.7M | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-3.9M | $9.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.3% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 40.3% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.5% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -5.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -106.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.2% | 309.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.5% | -30.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | -4.7% | 18.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.46 | $3.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.47 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.92 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.15 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.10 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4M | $470.1M |
| Total Assets | $108.2M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $12.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $646.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $873.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $470.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $539.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4M | $579.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $475.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.7M | $484.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $64.7M | $483.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $160.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 23 | $167.4M | $1.4B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.5M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.5M | $96.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.5M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $16.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $12.7M | $18.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $12.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 14.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 0.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LVLU
| Single Reportable Segment | $63.0M | 95% |
| Other | $2.4M | 4% |
| Stored Value Cards | $750.0K | 1% |
PLYM
Segment breakdown not available.