vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc (PTGX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($170.6M vs $86.7M, roughly 2.0× LXP Industrial Trust). Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc runs the higher net margin — 77.2% vs 33.2%, a 44.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (184.4% vs -14.0%).
LXP Industrial Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality industrial real estate assets, primarily distribution centers, logistics facilities, and light industrial properties across key markets in the United States. Its tenant base covers e-commerce, third-party logistics, and advanced manufacturing sectors, delivering stable long-term returns for its investors.
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing novel peptide-based targeted therapies for unmet medical needs, primarily covering gastrointestinal disorders, inflammatory diseases and rare disease indications. Its lead product candidates target inflammatory bowel disease and other chronic immune-related conditions, with operations spanning global R&D and partnership collaborations.
LXP vs PTGX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.7M | $170.6M |
| Net Profit | $28.8M | $131.7M |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.6% | 74.3% |
| Net Margin | 33.2% | 77.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.0% | 184.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 381.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | $170.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $86.3M | $255.0M |
| Q4 25 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $131.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-269.0K | $207.3M |
| Q4 25 | 81.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 85.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 82.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 80.9% |
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | 81.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $3.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $170.4M | $418.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $675.3M |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $744.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.66× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $170.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.8M | $418.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $293.8M | $322.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $675.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $560.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $744.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $629.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $188.7M | $184.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $182.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 107.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.56× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $101.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $188.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.2M | $184.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.9M | $-27.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $182.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-27.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 107.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.09× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
