vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) and SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO (SHEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($91.6M vs $86.7M, roughly 1.1× LXP Industrial Trust). LXP Industrial Trust runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs -5.9%, a 39.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.2% vs -14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO's revenue compounded faster (15.0% CAGR vs 0.3%).
LXP Industrial Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality industrial real estate assets, primarily distribution centers, logistics facilities, and light industrial properties across key markets in the United States. Its tenant base covers e-commerce, third-party logistics, and advanced manufacturing sectors, delivering stable long-term returns for its investors.
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co is a U.S. regional telecom provider offering broadband internet, wireless voice/data services, digital cable TV, and fiber-optic solutions. It serves residential, small business and enterprise clients across Mid-Atlantic states, focusing on underserved rural and suburban markets in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania.
LXP vs SHEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.7M | $91.6M |
| Net Profit | $28.8M | $-5.4M |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.6% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 33.2% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.0% | 7.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -95.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | $89.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.7M | $88.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.9M | $87.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | $85.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.6M | $87.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.8M | $85.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $86.3M | $69.2M |
| Q4 25 | $28.8M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.3M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-269.0K | $214.7M |
| Q4 25 | 81.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 85.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 82.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | -6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | -4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.2% | -10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | -15.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | 310.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $4.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $170.4M | $27.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.4B | $642.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $880.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.66× | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $170.4M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.7M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.0M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.9M | $87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.8M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $293.8M | $389.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $642.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $535.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $515.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $418.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $345.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $298.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $880.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $892.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $902.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $910.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $918.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $925.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $933.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $871.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.66× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $188.7M | $28.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-78.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -85.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 117.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.56× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-257.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $188.7M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.5M | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.0M | $20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.2M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.6M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.9M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-78.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-65.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-62.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-72.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-51.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-78.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-54.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -85.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -57.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -71.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -84.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -58.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -91.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -79.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 91.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 97.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 94.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 108.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 86.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 94.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 101.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.09× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LXP
Segment breakdown not available.
SHEN
| Residential And SMB Incumbent Broadband | $41.5M | 45% |
| Residential And SMB Glo Fiber Expansion Markets | $23.0M | 25% |
| Commercial Fiber | $20.3M | 22% |
| RLEC Other | $6.8M | 7% |
