vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) and Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LXP Industrial Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($86.7M vs $58.6M, roughly 1.5× Vitesse Energy, Inc.). LXP Industrial Trust runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs -1.3%, a 34.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vitesse Energy, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs -14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, LXP Industrial Trust's revenue compounded faster (0.3% CAGR vs -2.1%).
LXP Industrial Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality industrial real estate assets, primarily distribution centers, logistics facilities, and light industrial properties across key markets in the United States. Its tenant base covers e-commerce, third-party logistics, and advanced manufacturing sectors, delivering stable long-term returns for its investors.
Vitesse Energy, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered independent energy company focused on exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas assets. It operates primarily in high-potential onshore basins including North Dakota's Williston Basin, serving domestic and global upstream energy market demand.
LXP vs VTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.7M | $58.6M |
| Net Profit | $28.8M | $-739.0K |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 34.6% | -12.0% |
| Net Margin | 33.2% | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.0% | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 85.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | $58.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | $67.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.7M | $81.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.9M | $66.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | $55.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.6M | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.8M | $66.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $86.3M | $61.2M |
| Q4 25 | $28.8M | $-739.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.3M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-269.0K | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | 81.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 85.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 82.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | -12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 21.4% |
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.2% | 30.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | -3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $170.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $629.3M |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $893.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.66× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $170.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $293.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $629.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $650.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $671.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $667.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $500.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $520.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $518.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $522.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $893.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $932.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $951.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $975.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $810.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $791.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $778.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $749.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $188.7M | $37.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.56× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $188.7M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.5M | $49.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3M | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.0M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.2M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.6M | $45.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | $35.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.9M | $39.4M |
| Q4 25 | 6.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | 2.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.05× | 6.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.18× | 2.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.09× | 3.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LXP
Segment breakdown not available.
VTS
| Oil Reserves | $54.5M | 93% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $4.2M | 7% |
