vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) and SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO (SHEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($91.6M vs $47.3M, roughly 1.9× Mama's Creations, Inc.). Mama's Creations, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.1% vs -5.9%, a 7.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Mama's Creations, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (50.0% vs 7.2%). Mama's Creations, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.7M vs $-78.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Mama's Creations, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.0% CAGR vs 15.0%).
Mama's Creations, Inc. is a U.S.-based food manufacturing enterprise that produces a wide portfolio of refrigerated ready-to-eat and heat-and-serve food products, including Italian-style meatballs, sausages, pasta dishes, and other prepared meals. It mainly distributes its offerings to grocery retailers, mass merchandisers and foodservice partners across the United States, focusing on convenient, high-quality comfort food for daily consumer demand.
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co is a U.S. regional telecom provider offering broadband internet, wireless voice/data services, digital cable TV, and fiber-optic solutions. It serves residential, small business and enterprise clients across Mid-Atlantic states, focusing on underserved rural and suburban markets in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania.
MAMA vs SHEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.3M | $91.6M |
| Net Profit | $540.0K | $-5.4M |
| Gross Margin | 23.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.1% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 50.0% | 7.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 31.7% | -95.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $47.3M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.2M | $89.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.3M | $88.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.6M | $87.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.5M | $85.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $87.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8M | $85.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.7M | $69.2M |
| Q4 25 | $540.0K | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $410.0K | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $553.0K | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $214.7M |
| Q4 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | -4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | -10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -15.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 310.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.03 | $4.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.1M | $27.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $642.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $49.6M | $880.8M |
| Total Assets | $84.0M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.1M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | $87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.0M | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.0M | $389.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $642.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $535.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $515.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $418.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $345.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $298.7M |
| Q4 25 | $49.6M | $880.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.6M | $892.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.4M | $902.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.9M | $910.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.0M | $918.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $925.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $933.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.6M | $871.6M |
| Q4 25 | $84.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.1M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.9M | $28.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.7M | $-78.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.8% | -85.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 117.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.16× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.0M | $-257.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.9M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-857.0K | $20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | $-78.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $-65.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-930.0K | $-62.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-72.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.0M | $-51.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $-78.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $-54.9M |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | -85.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.2% | -57.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.8% | -71.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | -84.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.1% | -58.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.4% | -91.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | -79.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 91.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 97.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 94.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 108.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 86.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | 94.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 101.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.54× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.71× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.79× | 0.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MAMA
Segment breakdown not available.
SHEN
| Residential And SMB Incumbent Broadband | $41.5M | 45% |
| Residential And SMB Glo Fiber Expansion Markets | $23.0M | 25% |
| Commercial Fiber | $20.3M | 22% |
| RLEC Other | $6.8M | 7% |
