vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Massimo Group (MAMO) and PCB BANCORP (PCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PCB BANCORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($29.2M vs $21.0M, roughly 1.4× Massimo Group). On growth, Massimo Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 11.3%). Over the past eight quarters, PCB BANCORP's revenue compounded faster (10.4% CAGR vs -16.5%).
Massimo Dutti, S.A. is a Spanish premium clothing retailer specializing in cashmere and wool products, established in 1985 and owned by Spanish multinational company Inditex, the parent company of Zara, Pull&Bear, and other brands.
PCB Bank is an American community bank that focuses on the Korean-American community based in California and offers commercial banking services. It has branches in 8 states and is the third largest Korean American Bank after Bank of Hope and Hanmi Bank.
MAMO vs PCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.0M | $29.2M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 41.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | 45.0% |
| Net Margin | 9.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 15.7% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 215.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $0.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.0M | $29.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.0M | $30.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | $29.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $26.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.2M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.6M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.4M | $24.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.2M | $23.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.7K | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2M | $4.7M |
| Q4 25 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.1% | 45.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 52.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.2% | 40.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.4% | 39.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 36.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | 27.2% |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 37.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.0% | 28.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.8% | 30.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 19.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | $0.62 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $0.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.8M | $207.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.7M | $390.0M |
| Total Assets | $51.4M | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.8M | $207.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6M | $369.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $263.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $214.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $198.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $193.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $177.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $239.8M |
| Q4 25 | $23.7M | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.7M | $384.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | $376.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.9M | $370.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $363.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | $362.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.7M | $353.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.1M | $350.0M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.4M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.4M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.9M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.1M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.9M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.3M | $2.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.0M | $26.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $24.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 83.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.01× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $46.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.0M | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $633.2K | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.5M | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-637.0K | $8.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $34.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-741.4K | $6.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 83.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.7% | 133.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | 46.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.0% | 53.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 25.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | 9.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.92× | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.30× | 2.33× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.20× | 1.76× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
