vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Masco (MAS) and PAN AMERICAN SILVER CORP (PAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PAN AMERICAN SILVER CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.5× Masco).
Masco Corporation is an American manufacturer of products for the home improvement and new home construction markets. Comprising more than 20 companies, the Masco conglomerate operates nearly 60 manufacturing facilities in the United States and over 20 in other parts of the world. Since 1969 it trades on the NYSE. Under the leadership of Richard Manoogian, the company grew exponentially and subsequently joined the Fortune 500 list of largest U.S. corporations.
Pan American Silver Corporation is a mining company based in Canada with operations in Latin America. The company has mines and other projects in Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina.
MAS vs PAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2022
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $228.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 35.8% | 27.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 11.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $228.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $165.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $189.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $182.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $167.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $258.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.90 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.28 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.87 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.85 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $27.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 109.07× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $647.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $559.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $390.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $634.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $646.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $27.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-185.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-78.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-84.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-254.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-279.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-88.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | 109.07× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
