vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd (MATH) and PS International Group Ltd. (PSIG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PS International Group Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.2M vs $12.0M, roughly 1.9× Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd). PS International Group Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -1.8% vs -24.0%, a 22.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Metalpha Technology Holding LtdMATHEarnings & Financial Report
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd is a global fintech firm specializing in digital asset wealth management, institutional-grade crypto investment services, and Web3 ecosystem infrastructure support. It serves professional investors, financial institutions, and high-net-worth clients across Asia, North America and Europe, with core segments including structured digital asset products, risk management solutions and DeFi technology development.
P.S. Fashion is an international brand from Serbia. It is the flagship chain store of the P.S. Fashion Design, clothing company headquartered in Čačak, Serbia.
MATH vs PSIG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.0M | $23.2M |
| Net Profit | $-2.9M | $-415.2K |
| Gross Margin | 28.3% | 0.9% |
| Operating Margin | -24.2% | -8.4% |
| Net Margin | -24.0% | -1.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -39.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -147.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $39.4M |
| Q3 25 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-415.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-445.6K |
| Q3 25 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 85.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.1% |
| Q3 25 | -24.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.2% |
| Q3 25 | -24.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.1% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.1M | $7.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $101.2K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $35.1M | $10.9M |
| Total Assets | $413.8M | $15.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.6M |
| Q3 25 | $101.2K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $188.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.1K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $35.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.4M |
| Q3 25 | $413.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $246.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $27.5M |
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MATH
Segment breakdown not available.
PSIG
| Air freight | $22.6M | 97% |
| Ocean freight | $599.6K | 3% |
| Ancillary logistic services | $35.8K | 0% |
