vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW) and Ralliant Corp (RAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ralliant Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($529.1M vs $284.8M, roughly 1.9× MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP). MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs 7.5%, a 7.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ralliant Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.5% vs -29.1%). Ralliant Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($126.6M vs $-57.2M).
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
MATW vs RAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.8M | $529.1M |
| Net Profit | $43.6M | $39.9M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | 50.8% |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -29.1% | -0.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1356.6% | -56.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.39 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $284.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $529.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $503.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $531.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $533.7M |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $47.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $90.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $64.8M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 51.5% |
| Q4 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.7% |
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.39 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $264.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $529.8M | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $543.2M | $3.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $5.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | 0.39× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $264.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $198.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $529.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $543.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.0B |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-52.0M | $138.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-57.2M | $126.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -20.1% | 23.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.19× | 3.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-52.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-57.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $126.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -20.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MATW
Segment breakdown not available.
RAL
| Industrial Manufacturing | $111.1M | 21% |
| Defense And Space | $93.6M | 18% |
| Diversified Electronics | $91.0M | 17% |
| Test And Measurement | $76.8M | 15% |
| Communications | $60.7M | 11% |
| Semiconductors | $51.4M | 10% |
| Other Direct End Markets | $44.4M | 8% |
