vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW) and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.8M vs $265.6M, roughly 1.1× Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.). MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs 2.3%, a 13.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.4% vs -29.1%). Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.5M vs $-57.2M).
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is a real estate investment trust that invests in hotels. As of December 31, 2024, it owned 31 hotels comprising 9,408 rooms.
MATW vs XHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.8M | $265.6M |
| Net Profit | $43.6M | $6.1M |
| Gross Margin | 35.0% | 30.4% |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | 2.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -29.1% | 1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1356.6% | 1053.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.39 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $284.8M | $265.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $236.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $287.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $288.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $261.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $236.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $272.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $267.5M |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $55.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-638.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.5M |
| Q4 25 | 35.0% | 30.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.6% |
| Q4 25 | 34.2% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.39 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.4M | $140.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $529.8M | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $543.2M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | 1.25× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.4M | $140.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $188.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $112.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $161.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $143.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $140.1M |
| Q4 25 | $529.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $543.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.98× | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-52.0M | $21.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-57.2M | $5.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -20.1% | 2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 6.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.19× | 3.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $89.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-52.0M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $57.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.2M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $44.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.7M |
| Q4 25 | -20.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.5% |
| Q4 25 | -1.19× | 3.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MATW
Segment breakdown not available.
XHR
| Other Geographic Areas | $79.1M | 30% |
| Orlando Florida | $35.5M | 13% |
| Phoenix Arizona | $32.4M | 12% |
| Houston Texas | $29.0M | 11% |
| San Diego California | $25.5M | 10% |
| Atlanta Georgia | $16.2M | 6% |
| San Francisco San Mateo California | $14.8M | 6% |
| Nashville TN | $11.7M | 4% |
| San Jose Santa Cruz CA | $10.5M | 4% |
| Hotel Other Direct | $6.6M | 2% |
