vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. (MAXN) and Service Properties Trust (SVC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($509.0M vs $296.5M, roughly 1.7× Service Properties Trust). Service Properties Trust runs the higher net margin — -0.3% vs -120.7%, a 120.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Service Properties Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-17.0% vs -54.7%). Service Properties Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-95.2M vs $-322.3M).
Maxeon Solar Technologies, Ltd. is a Singapore-based company that designs and manufactures photovoltaic panels. The company was previously a division of the American company SunPower. Maxeon was spun off from SunPower in August 2020. Maxeon was the primary provider of solar panels for SunPower through March 2024. Beyond the United States, Maxeon has sales operations in more than 100 countries and has the rights to use the SunPower brand in countries outside the United States.
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
MAXN vs SVC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $509.0M | $296.5M |
| Net Profit | $-614.3M | $-782.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -113.3% | -3.9% |
| Net Margin | -120.7% | -0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -54.7% | -17.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -122.7% | 99.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-96.00 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $296.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $377.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $404.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $335.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $509.0M | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $390.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $412.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $336.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-782.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-46.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-116.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-614.3M | $-76.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-46.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-73.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-78.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -113.3% | -19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -17.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -21.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -120.7% | -21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -17.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -23.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-96.00 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.9M | $346.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-293.8M | $646.1M |
| Total Assets | $376.3M | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 8.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $346.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $417.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.9M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $71.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $646.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $647.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $695.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $734.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-293.8M | $851.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $929.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $376.3M | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-270.2M | $-18.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-322.3M | $-95.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -63.3% | -32.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.2% | 25.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-107.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-18.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $38.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-270.2M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $106.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-926.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-95.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-46.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-322.3M | $-88.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-22.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-77.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -63.3% | -24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -23.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
