vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Marathon Bancorp, Inc. (MBBC) and Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. (VEEE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0M vs $2.2M, roughly 1.3× Marathon Bancorp, Inc.). Marathon Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.3% vs -85.6%, a 107.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Twin Vee PowerCats, Co. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (60.4% vs 41.7%). Marathon Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.4M vs $-1.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Marathon Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.3% CAGR vs -24.3%).
Marathon Bancorp, Inc. is a Maryland-based financial holding company that primarily operates through its community bank subsidiary. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking products including deposit accounts, consumer loans, commercial mortgages, and small business financing, serving individual and small-to-medium enterprise customers across local markets in Maryland.
Twin Vee PowerCats Co. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance recreational power catamaran boats. The company offers a diverse lineup of catamaran models suited for leisure cruising, fishing, water sports, and commercial marine use, serving customers primarily across North America, with a growing distribution network in global coastal markets.
MBBC vs VEEE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2M | $3.0M |
| Net Profit | $501.4K | $-2.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 3.7% |
| Operating Margin | 26.2% | -87.7% |
| Net Margin | 22.3% | -85.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 41.7% | 60.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 880.7% | -119.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $-1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | $501.4K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.3K | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-332.0K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.4K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.1K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.9K | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.8K | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-631.1K | $-2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -57.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 26.2% | -87.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.5% | -81.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.7% | -35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -224.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.4% | -107.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | -107.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -53.7% | -48.2% |
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | -85.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | -80.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.9% | -34.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | -44.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | -62.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | -103.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | -104.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -40.7% | -44.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | $-1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | $-1.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $-3.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | $-2.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $-3.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.31 | $-1.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $499.9K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $46.9M | $13.5M |
| Total Assets | $248.0M | $16.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $499.9K |
| Q4 25 | $46.9M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.3M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.7M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.0M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.7M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.3M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.4M | $22.3M |
| Q4 25 | $248.0M | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $246.0M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $238.8M | $22.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $236.8M | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.9M | $25.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $219.3M | $33.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $225.8M | $36.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4M | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.4M | $-1.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 62.3% | -62.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.82× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.9M | $-9.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $464.0K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $-745.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $849.0K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.6K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $945.2K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.6K | $-482.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-802.1K | $-1.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $456.6K | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $773.2K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.0K | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $921.6K | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | 62.3% | -62.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | -91.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 66.0% | -30.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.3% | -71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | -192.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.1% | -128.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -118.5% | -51.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -67.9% | -70.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 68.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 145.2% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.2% | 37.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.82× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.85× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.