vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MERCURY GENERAL CORP (MCY) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.4× MERCURY GENERAL CORP). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 13.2%, a 2.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MERCURY GENERAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.4% vs 11.3%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $273.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 9.8%).
Mercury General Corporation is a multiple-line insurance organization that offers personal automobiles, homeowners, renters, and business insurance. Mercury's primary focus is automobiles and homeowners' insurance.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
MCY vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $202.5M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 99.7% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 13.2% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.4% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 100.4% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.66 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $202.5M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $280.4M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.5M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-108.3M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.1M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.9M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.6M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 99.7% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 99.8% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 99.8% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 99.7% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 99.7% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.8% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 99.8% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.2% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.8% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.1% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.66 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.06 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.01 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.96 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.82 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.17 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $575.0M | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $9.6B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $575.0M | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $575.0M | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.6B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.24× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.30× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $287.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $273.9M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.8% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.42× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.0B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $287.9M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $496.4M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $371.6M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-68.7M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $248.3M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $318.1M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $278.0M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $273.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $479.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $357.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-81.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $236.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $306.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $266.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.42× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.77× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.23× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.46× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.38× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.44× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
