vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MODIV INDUSTRIAL, INC. (MDV) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.5M vs $11.1M, roughly 1.0× MODIV INDUSTRIAL, INC.). On growth, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs -5.6%). Over the past eight quarters, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (3.5% CAGR vs -3.8%).
MODIV INDUSTRIAL, INC. is a U.S.-based industrial real estate enterprise focused on acquiring, owning and operating high-quality industrial properties mainly located in key logistics and distribution hubs across North America. It serves tenants from sectors including e-commerce fulfillment, manufacturing and third-party logistics, addressing rising demand for modern supply chain infrastructure.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
MDV vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.1M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $1.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 45.8% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | 11.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -5.6% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -22.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.8M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.8M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.7M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.4M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.0M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.0M | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $829.0K | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-587.0K | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | 45.8% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.2% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.4% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.0% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.6% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.6% | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.1% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.0% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.6% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.1% | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.32 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.33 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $14.4M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $261.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $162.7M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $476.5M | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.4M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.4M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $261.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $279.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $279.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $279.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $279.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $279.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $162.7M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.8M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.6M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.1M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.1M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.3M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.0M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $188.0M | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | $476.5M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $499.6M | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $498.9M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $506.8M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $507.8M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.4M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $519.5M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $522.5M | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.49× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.0M | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 12.34× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1M | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 12.34× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.95× | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.68× | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.72× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.80× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
