vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MESOBLAST LTD (MESO) and PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7M vs $1.9M, roughly 1.4× MESOBLAST LTD). PureCycle Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -697.1% vs -959.3%, a 262.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Mesoblast Limited is an Australian regenerative medicine company. It seeks to provide treatments for inflammatory ailments, cardiovascular disease, and back pain. The company is led by Silviu Itescu, who founded the company in 2004.
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. is a sustainable materials firm with proprietary advanced polypropylene recycling technology. It converts contaminated polypropylene waste into high-purity virgin-equivalent resin for use in consumer goods, automotive parts, packaging and industrial products, serving global partners.
MESO vs PCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2023 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | $-18.6M | $-18.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -2196.1% |
| Net Margin | -959.3% | -697.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.7% | 71.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0 |
| Q4 25 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-144.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-90.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-48.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-85.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -2196.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1602.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2763.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2387.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -697.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1167.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8741.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $48.8M | $156.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $482.2M | $45.9M |
| Total Assets | $650.4M | $922.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $156.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $234.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $284.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $68.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $238.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $180.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $241.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $291.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $336.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $922.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $989.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $787.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $798.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $788.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $719.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $734.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-16.3M | $-28.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-42.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1559.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 495.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-183.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-36.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-38.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-33.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-39.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-42.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-53.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-53.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-42.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-50.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-53.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1559.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1743.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2747.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3409.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 495.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 160.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 521.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 949.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
