vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of mF International Ltd (MFI) and Moolec Science SA (MLEC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Moolec Science SA is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.6M vs $1.9M, roughly 1.4× mF International Ltd). mF International Ltd runs the higher net margin — -90.9% vs -91.8%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
MF Global Holdings Ltd., formerly known as Man Financial, was a major global financial derivatives broker, or commodities brokerage firm that went bankrupt in 2011. MF Global provided exchange-traded derivatives, such as futures and options as well as over-the-counter products such as contracts for difference (CFDs), foreign exchange and spread betting. MF Global Inc., its broker-dealer subsidiary, was a primary dealer in United States Treasury securities. A series of perceived liquidity prob...
Moolec Science SA is a global agricultural biotechnology and food technology company specializing in molecular farming. It uses engineered crop platforms to produce sustainable, cost-competitive animal-derived proteins for use in alternative meat, dairy products and food ingredients, serving food manufacturers, agribusinesses and consumer goods brands across North America, Europe and Latin America.
MFI vs MLEC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $2.6M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7M | $-2.4M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | -25.5% |
| Operating Margin | -93.4% | -77.9% |
| Net Margin | -90.9% | -91.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -145.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.7M |
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-710.3K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q2 25 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 12.7% |
| Q2 25 | -93.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -77.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -50.7% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -130.3% |
| Q2 25 | -90.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -91.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.5% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -91.4% |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6M | $1.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $518.6K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.8M | $2.8M |
| Total Assets | $5.6M | $31.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $853.6K |
| Q2 25 | $518.6K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $8.9M |
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $22.5M |
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-335.3K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-339.2K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -17.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 4.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $-335.3K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q2 25 | $-339.2K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.8M |
| Q2 25 | -17.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -142.0% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -106.2% |
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 6.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
