vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP (MFIN) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($70.6M vs $41.9M, roughly 1.7× Namib Minerals).
Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited (MMFSL) is an Indian rural non-banking financial company headquartered in Mumbai. It is amongst the top tractor financers in India, with 1000+ offices across the country.
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
MFIN vs NAMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $70.6M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $12.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | 29.3% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | 17.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 25.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $70.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.6M | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.1% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.37 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $136.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $216.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $408.6M | — |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.53× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $136.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $98.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $216.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $215.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $199.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $232.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $232.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $225.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $408.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $389.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $380.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $370.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $354.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $349.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.65× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $126.3M | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 17.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 10.35× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $126.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.97× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.72× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.86× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.89× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.22× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
