vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Marygold Companies, Inc. (MGLD) and PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC. (PPSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Marygold Companies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6M vs $5.6M, roughly 1.4× PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.). Marygold Companies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.5% vs -24.7%, a 17.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Marygold Companies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.5% vs -42.3%). Over the past eight quarters, PIONEER POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (30.3% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Marygold Companies, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered diversified holding company that operates across three core segments: financial services, specialty manufacturing, and consumer goods. It primarily caters to North American markets, driving long-term value growth via strategic investment in, and operational optimization of, its portfolio of subsidiary entities.
Caterpillar Energy Solutions GmbH, is a mechanical engineering company based in Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. It was known as MWM GmbH Motoren-Werke Mannheim (MWM) until November 2013. In 2009 the company was the third-largest producer by revenue of gas and diesel engines.
MGLD vs PPSI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6M | $5.6M |
| Net Profit | $-576.0K | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 74.0% | 23.5% |
| Operating Margin | -8.3% | -19.4% |
| Net Margin | -7.5% | -24.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.5% | -42.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 67.0% | -103.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.6M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $6.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-576.0K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-356.0K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-929.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-529.0K | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 74.0% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.1% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.1% | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.5% | 18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 70.5% | 16.1% |
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | -19.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.2% | -21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.5% | -20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.4% | -34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.8% | -11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | -11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.3% | -51.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.7% | -52.1% |
| Q4 25 | -7.5% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.1% | -34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.4% | -15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.4% | -13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.8% | 372.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.1% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.5% | -67.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.7% | -31.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $3.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.7M | $29.3M |
| Total Assets | $27.8M | $35.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6M | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | $41.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.0M | $6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.1M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $29.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.9M | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0M | $33.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $34.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $14.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.4M | $18.1M |
| Q4 25 | $27.8M | $35.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.4M | $37.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.4M | $39.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.5M | $47.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.0M | $66.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.9M | $40.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.7M | $39.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-908.0K | $-1.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -38.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 20.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-8.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-908.0K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-533.0K | $-817.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-770.0K | $-2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-893.0K | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $571.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-658.0K | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-562.0K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $907.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-776.0K | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-940.0K | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $170.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -38.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.1% | -23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.8% | -67.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | -46.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.9% | -53.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -65.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MGLD
| Fund Management Related Party | $4.6M | 60% |
| Food Products | $1.7M | 22% |
| Beauty Products | $1.2M | 15% |
| Other | $268.0K | 4% |
PPSI
| Total Revenue | $4.0M | 70% |
| Other | $1.7M | 30% |
