vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Marygold Companies, Inc. (MGLD) and Satellogic Inc. (SATL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Marygold Companies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6M vs $6.2M, roughly 1.2× Satellogic Inc.). Satellogic Inc. runs the higher net margin — 488.0% vs -7.5%, a 495.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Marygold Companies, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered diversified holding company that operates across three core segments: financial services, specialty manufacturing, and consumer goods. It primarily caters to North American markets, driving long-term value growth via strategic investment in, and operational optimization of, its portfolio of subsidiary entities.
Satellogic Inc. is an American company specializing in Earth-observation satellites, founded in 2010 by Emiliano Kargieman and Gerardo Richarte.
MGLD vs SATL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6M | $6.2M |
| Net Profit | $-576.0K | $30.5M |
| Gross Margin | 74.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.3% | -114.2% |
| Net Margin | -7.5% | 488.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 67.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.6M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-576.0K | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-356.0K | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-18.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-529.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 74.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 70.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | -114.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.2% | -222.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.5% | -141.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.4% | -280.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.3% | -419.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.5% | 488.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.1% | 109.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.4% | -149.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.4% | -961.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.5% | -517.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.6M | $94.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.7M | $60.5M |
| Total Assets | $27.8M | $151.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.6M | $94.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.0M | $25.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $60.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.9M | $-56.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0M | $-68.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $-83.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $27.8M | $151.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.4M | $70.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.4M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.5M | $61.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | $76.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-908.0K | $-9.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -204.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 53.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-34.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-908.0K | $-9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-533.0K | $-8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-770.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-893.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-658.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-562.0K | $-9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-776.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-940.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -204.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.1% | -267.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.8% | -115.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -195.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 53.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 56.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MGLD
| Fund Management Related Party | $4.6M | 60% |
| Food Products | $1.7M | 22% |
| Beauty Products | $1.2M | 15% |
| Other | $268.0K | 4% |
SATL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $5.7M | 91% |
| Other | $547.0K | 9% |
