vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Marygold Companies, Inc. (MGLD) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Velo3D, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.4M vs $7.6M, roughly 1.2× Marygold Companies, Inc.). Marygold Companies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.5% vs -231.9%, a 224.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Marygold Companies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.5% vs -25.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Marygold Companies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.5% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Marygold Companies, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered diversified holding company that operates across three core segments: financial services, specialty manufacturing, and consumer goods. It primarily caters to North American markets, driving long-term value growth via strategic investment in, and operational optimization of, its portfolio of subsidiary entities.
Velo3D, Inc. develops and sells advanced end-to-end metal additive manufacturing (3D printing) solutions, comprising industrial-grade printers, specialized processing software, and high-performance metal materials. It primarily serves global aerospace, defense, energy, semiconductor and industrial manufacturing markets, enabling customers to produce complex, high-precision metal parts that are difficult to manufacture with traditional methods.
MGLD vs VELO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6M | $9.4M |
| Net Profit | $-576.0K | $-21.9M |
| Gross Margin | 74.0% | -73.6% |
| Operating Margin | -8.3% | -231.0% |
| Net Margin | -7.5% | -231.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.5% | -25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 67.0% | -2.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.9M | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-576.0K | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-356.0K | $-11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $935.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-529.0K | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | 74.0% | -73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.8% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.1% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.1% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.5% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 70.5% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | -231.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.2% | -73.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.5% | -85.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.4% | -123.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.8% | -167.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.4% | -213.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.3% | -187.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.7% | -211.1% |
| Q4 25 | -7.5% | -231.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.1% | -82.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.4% | -97.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.4% | -268.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.8% | -168.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.1% | -265.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -22.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.7% | -281.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $-1.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $7.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-35.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $1.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $-55.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.6M | $39.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $31.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.7M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $27.8M | $105.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.6M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $854.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.1M | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $44.0M |
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.9M | $29.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0M | $21.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.4M | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | $27.8M | $105.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.4M | $93.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.4M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.5M | $91.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.0M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.9M | $110.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.9M | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.7M | $136.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-908.0K | $-7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -88.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 6.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-908.0K | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-533.0K | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-770.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-893.0K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.9M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-658.0K | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-562.0K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-776.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-940.0K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -88.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.1% | -46.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.8% | -22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.9% | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.8% | -77.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -209.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MGLD
| Fund Management Related Party | $4.6M | 60% |
| Food Products | $1.7M | 22% |
| Beauty Products | $1.2M | 15% |
| Other | $268.0K | 4% |
VELO
Segment breakdown not available.
