vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of M/I HOMES, INC. (MHO) and SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. (SGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.6× M/I HOMES, INC.). SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs 5.6%, a 2.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (54.7% vs -4.8%). SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.1M vs $-13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.3% CAGR vs 4.7%).
M/I Homes, Inc. is a leading U.S. residential construction company that designs, builds and sells single-family homes, townhomes and duplexes across multiple U.S. states. It caters to entry-level, move-up and luxury homebuyers, offering energy-efficient designs, flexible floor plans and personalized customization options.
Somnigroup International Inc. is an American manufacturer of mattresses and bedding products.
MHO vs SGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $64.0M | $140.8M |
| Gross Margin | 17.4% | 44.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 13.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.6% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.8% | 54.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -52.1% | 95.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.42 | $0.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $976.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $64.0M | $140.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.5M | $177.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.2M | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.2M | $-33.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.5M | $71.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.4M | $130.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $106.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.1M | $76.3M |
| Q4 25 | 17.4% | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.5% | 44.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.7% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | 36.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 44.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.1% | 43.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.8% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.6% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | $2.42 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.92 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.42 | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.98 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.71 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.10 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.12 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.78 | $0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $4.8B | $11.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $559.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $564.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $411.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $326.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $11.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.92× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.74× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.7M | $99.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.0M | $41.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.1% | 2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.14× | 0.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $127.7M | $633.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-8.7M | $99.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.4M | $408.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.8M | $186.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.9M | $106.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.4M | $129.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-67.9M | $256.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.5M | $150.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $115.8M | $130.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-13.0M | $41.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.0M | $360.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $149.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.5M | $82.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.3M | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-68.5M | $240.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.0M | $122.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $115.5M | $98.7M |
| Q4 25 | -1.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.0% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | -0.14× | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 2.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.31× | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.78× | 1.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.47× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.19× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.84× | 1.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MHO
| Southern Homebuilding | $615.6M | 54% |
| Northern Homebuilding | $503.9M | 44% |
| Financial Service | $27.8M | 2% |
| Land | $4.7M | 0% |
SGI
| Mattress Firm Segment | $892.1M | 48% |
| Tempur Sealy North America Segment | $620.5M | 33% |
| Tempur Sealy International Segment | $355.8M | 19% |
