vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MID PENN BANCORP INC (MPB) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MID PENN BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.0M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.5× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). MID PENN BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 31.4% vs -19.9%, a 51.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MID PENN BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs -20.7%). MID PENN BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($71.8M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, MID PENN BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (21.1% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Commerce Bancorp was a Cherry Hill, New Jersey–based bank created in 1973. In 2007, it was purchased by Toronto-Dominion Bank, which merged Commerce into TD Banknorth, the latter of which was rebranded to TD Bank.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
MPB vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $62.0M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $19.4M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | 43.6% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | 31.4% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 30.8% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 47.0% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.83 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $62.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.8M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.3M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.7M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.4M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.3M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.1M | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.3M | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $19.4M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.3M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.7M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | 43.6% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.3% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.2% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.1% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.4% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.8% | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 31.4% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.6% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.8% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.7% | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.83 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.79 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.71 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.72 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.74 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.71 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.73 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $814.1M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $6.1B | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $814.1M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $796.3M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $775.7M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $667.9M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.0M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $573.1M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $559.7M | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $551.0M | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.4B | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5B | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $426.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $80.0M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $71.8M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 115.8% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.3% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.12× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $132.1M | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.0M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.0M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.5M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.4M | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $71.8M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.5M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.8M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 115.8% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.4% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.1% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 93.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.1% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.2% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.5% | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 13.3% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.08× | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.02× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MPB
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |