vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC (PEBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $21.5M, roughly 1.9× PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC). PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC runs the higher net margin — 30.8% vs -19.9%, a 50.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.6% vs -20.7%). PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($20.0M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC's revenue compounded faster (4.2% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC is a regional bank holding company headquartered in North Carolina, U.S. It offers a full suite of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, consumer and business loans, mortgage services, and wealth management solutions, primarily serving local residents, small and medium-sized enterprises, and community organizations across its operating areas in North Carolina.
MX vs PEBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $21.5M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $6.6M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | 40.7% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | 30.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 5.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | 86.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $1.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $21.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $20.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | 28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | 22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | 26.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | 23.9% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | 19.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $1.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $0.79 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $0.72 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $0.89 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $0.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $58.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $157.1M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $73.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $157.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $149.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $144.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $138.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $130.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $136.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $124.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $121.1M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $21.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $20.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | 92.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 6.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.22× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $34.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | 92.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | 20.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | 25.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 98.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | 32.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | 17.9% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
PEBK
Segment breakdown not available.
