vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) and Primerica, Inc. (PRI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Primerica, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($853.7M vs $804.2M, roughly 1.1× Monolithic Power Systems). Monolithic Power Systems runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 23.1%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Monolithic Power Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.1% vs 11.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Monolithic Power Systems's revenue compounded faster (25.9% CAGR vs 7.2%).
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is an American, publicly traded company headquartered in Kirkland, Washington. It operates in more than 15 locations worldwide.
Primerica, Inc. is a multi-level marketing company that provides insurance, investment and financial services to middle-income families in the United States and Canada.
MPWR vs PRI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $804.2M | $853.7M |
| Net Profit | $193.2M | $197.0M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | 28.9% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | 23.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.1% | 11.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 43.1% | 17.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.92 | $6.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $804.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $751.2M | $853.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $737.2M | $839.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $664.6M | $793.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $637.6M | $804.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $621.7M | $768.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $620.1M | $774.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.4M | $803.4M |
| Q1 26 | $193.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.7M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.8M | $206.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | $178.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.1M | $169.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $167.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.4M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $1.2M |
| Q1 26 | 55.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | 98.0% |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.6% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 64.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 32.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.0% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 201.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | $3.92 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.50 | $6.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.74 | $6.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.81 | $5.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.81 | $5.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.71 | $4.92 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.95 | $4.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.05 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | $756.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $15.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $756.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $621.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $625.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $862.9M | $687.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $550.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $627.3M |
| Q1 26 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $15.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $14.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $14.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $14.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $14.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $14.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $14.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $338.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.72× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $338.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $239.3M | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $237.6M | $162.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.4M | $197.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.7M | $270.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.7M | $207.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.0M | $173.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | 0.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.90× | 1.17× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | 1.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.40× | 147.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MPWR
Segment breakdown not available.
PRI
| Revenues From Sources Other Than Contracts With Customers | $445.9M | 52% |
| Investment And Savings Products Segment Revenues | $340.3M | 40% |
| Other | $56.5M | 7% |
| Segment Revenues From Contracts With Customers | $11.0M | 1% |
