vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM) and Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Spire Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.8M vs $14.9M, roughly 1.1× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. runs the higher net margin — -2.0% vs -176.6%, a 174.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs -26.9%). Over the past eight quarters, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.'s revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs -32.6%).
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
Spire Global, Inc. is a space-to-cloud data and analytics company that specializes in the tracking of global data sets powered by a large constellation of nanosatellites, such as the tracking of maritime, aviation and weather patterns.
MRAM vs SPIR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.9M | $15.8M |
| Net Profit | $-296.0K | $-28.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.7% | 40.2% |
| Operating Margin | 29.0% | -164.1% |
| Net Margin | -2.0% | -176.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.2% | -26.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 42.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.1M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | $23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6M | $25.4M |
| Q1 26 | $-296.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.0K | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-670.0K | $119.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $-48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-16.6M |
| Q1 26 | 52.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.8% | 40.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.3% | 48.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.4% | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.3% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.2% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.0% | 43.0% |
| Q1 26 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.2% | -164.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | -166.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.9% | -122.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.7% | -106.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.8% | -144.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.5% | -48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.5% | -48.6% |
| Q1 26 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | -176.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | -155.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.1% | 623.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | -86.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | -225.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | -43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.5% | -65.2% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $-0.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $3.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-1.93 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-0.68 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.5M | $81.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $70.2M | $112.9M |
| Total Assets | $83.2M | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $40.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.3M | $96.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.0M | $117.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.8M | $45.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.9M |
| Q1 26 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.8M | $133.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.1M | $149.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.0M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.6M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.3M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4M | $40.3M |
| Q1 26 | $83.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $84.6M | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.3M | $224.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.9M | $239.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.2M | $208.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | $193.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.6M | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.6M | $230.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $570.0K | $-4.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-16.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -102.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 75.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-92.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $570.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $881.0K | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | $-35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-4.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-975.0K | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $543.0K | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $-38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $527.0K | $-17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $-24.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-9.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | -102.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | -161.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.9% | -201.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | -72.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | -112.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | -39.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 66.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 21.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
SPIR
Segment breakdown not available.
