vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM) and TEJON RANCH CO (TRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TEJON RANCH CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.1M vs $14.9M, roughly 1.4× EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC.). TEJON RANCH CO runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -2.0%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TEJON RANCH CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.7% vs 13.2%). Over the past eight quarters, TEJON RANCH CO's revenue compounded faster (68.8% CAGR vs 18.2%).
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
Tejon Ranch Company, based in Lebec, California, is one of the largest private landowners in California. The company was incorporated in 1936 to organize the ownership of a large tract of land that was consolidated from four Mexican land grants acquired in the 1850s and 1860s by ranch founder Edward Fitzgerald Beale.
MRAM vs TRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.9M | $21.1M |
| Net Profit | $-296.0K | $1.6M |
| Gross Margin | 52.7% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 29.0% | 10.9% |
| Net Margin | -2.0% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.2% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -64.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | $21.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $17.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6M | $5.7M |
| Q1 26 | $-296.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.0K | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-670.0K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $957.0K |
| Q1 26 | 52.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.8% | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.3% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.4% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.3% | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.2% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.0% | 45.3% |
| Q1 26 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | -16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.9% | -48.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.7% | -50.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.8% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.5% | -34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.5% | -62.4% |
| Q1 26 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.1% | -20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | -17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | -16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.5% | 16.8% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.5M | $9.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $70.2M | $475.2M |
| Total Assets | $83.2M | $630.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $40.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $39.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.8M | $33.0M |
| Q1 26 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | $475.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.8M | $473.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.1M | $471.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.0M | $472.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.6M | $473.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.3M | $468.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4M | $469.2M |
| Q1 26 | $83.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $84.6M | $630.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.3M | $629.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.9M | $618.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.2M | $614.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | $608.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.6M | $598.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.6M | $590.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $570.0K | $6.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.88× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $570.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $881.0K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | $-381.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-1.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-975.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $543.0K | $-14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $527.0K | $-18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | $-42.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-15.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | -122.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.9% | -240.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | -230.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | -239.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | -155.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | -277.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 102.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 236.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 213.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 319.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 174.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 245.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.19× | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.31× | -1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.16× | 3.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.88× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MRAM
| Product sales | $14.1M | 95% |
| Licensing, royalty, patent, engineering services and other revenue | $772.0K | 5% |
TRC
Segment breakdown not available.
