vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Medirom Healthcare Technologies Inc. (MRM) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $21.1M, roughly 2.0× Medirom Healthcare Technologies Inc.). Namib Minerals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.4M vs $-2.4K).
Medirom Healthcare Technologies Inc. develops and delivers integrated digital health and remote patient monitoring solutions targeted at chronic disease management, post-operative care, and senior health support. It serves healthcare providers, insurance payers, and institutional care partners across key markets in North America and the Asia-Pacific region, prioritizing accessible, data-driven care to improve patient outcomes.
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
MRM vs NAMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.1M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $-4.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | -28.5% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | -21.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $252.3K | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6M | — |
| Total Assets | $52.0M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 5.55× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $252.3K | — |
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | — |
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | — |
| Q2 25 | $52.0M | — |
| Q2 25 | 5.55× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.3K | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.4K | $7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.0% | 17.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $-2.3K | $11.4M |
| Q2 25 | $-2.4K | $7.4M |
| Q2 25 | -0.0% | 17.6% |
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 9.6% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MRM
| Professional services expense | $20.0M | 95% |
| Other | $1.1M | 5% |
NAMM
Segment breakdown not available.
