vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and PAN AMERICAN SILVER CORP (PAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PAN AMERICAN SILVER CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.4× Marvell Technology, Inc.).
Marvell Technology, Inc. is an American company, headquartered in Santa Clara, California, which develops and produces semiconductors and related technology. Founded in 1995, the company had more than 6,500 employees as of 2024, with over 10,000 patents worldwide, and an annual revenue of $5.5 billion for fiscal 2024.
Pan American Silver Corporation is a mining company based in Canada with operations in Latin America. The company has mines and other projects in Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina.
MRVL vs PAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2022
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $1.9B | — |
| Gross Margin | 51.6% | 27.0% |
| Operating Margin | 17.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 91.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 36.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 381.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.20 | $-1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-676.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-193.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-215.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-392.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 51.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 46.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 91.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -44.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -27.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.20 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.78 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.45 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.7B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | — |
| Total Assets | $21.6B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.32× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $885.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $948.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $868.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $808.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $847.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $950.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $14.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $21.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.28× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $582.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $508.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.6B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $582.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $461.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $514.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $536.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $306.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $324.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $546.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $508.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $214.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $444.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $461.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $258.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $475.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
