vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EMERSON RADIO CORP (MSN) and OLB GROUP, INC. (OLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EMERSON RADIO CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9M vs $1.8M, roughly 1.1× OLB GROUP, INC.). EMERSON RADIO CORP runs the higher net margin — -36.7% vs -83.7%, a 47.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLB GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-35.2% vs -52.8%). Over the past eight quarters, EMERSON RADIO CORP's revenue compounded faster (-7.3% CAGR vs -28.7%).
Emerson Radio Corporation is one of the United States' largest volume consumer electronics distributors and has a recognized trademark in continuous use since 1912. The company designs, markets, and licenses many product lines worldwide, including products sold, and sometimes licensed, under the brand name G Clef, an homage to Emerson's logo.
OLB Group, Inc. is a global financial technology provider offering omnichannel payment processing solutions, e-commerce enablement tools, and digital banking services for small and medium-sized enterprises across North America, Europe, and key Asia-Pacific markets. Its core segments include merchant services, crypto payment integration, and cloud-based business management platforms.
MSN vs OLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9M | $1.8M |
| Net Profit | $-694.0K | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | 10.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -43.7% | -83.7% |
| Net Margin | -36.7% | -83.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -52.8% | -35.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.7% | 67.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-694.0K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.4M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-527.0K | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-881.0K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-962.0K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-883.0K | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -43.7% | -83.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -98.4% | -49.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -78.1% | -74.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -137.8% | -36.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.3% | -166.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -40.8% | -52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -55.6% | -74.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -52.2% | -82.6% |
| Q4 25 | -36.7% | -83.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -85.8% | -50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -68.1% | -93.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -127.9% | -46.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.2% | -167.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.2% | -52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -43.8% | -75.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -40.1% | -67.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $-3.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-1.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.6M | $4.6M |
| Total Assets | $20.1M | $12.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $29.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.4M | $27.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $41.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $53.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.9M | $3.3K |
| Q4 25 | $18.6M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.9M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.2M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $20.1M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.7M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.3M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.5M | $12.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.4M | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.6M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.5M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.1M | $18.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-228.0K | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-228.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | $-115.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-514.0K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-391.0K | $-155.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-293.0K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-376.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-840.0K | $-785.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | $-424.7K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-301.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -77.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -46.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -102.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MSN
| Products | $1.8M | 95% |
| Other | $87.0K | 5% |
OLB
| Transaction And Processing Fees | $1.7M | 94% |
| Other | $99.2K | 6% |
